order from Amazon

95 theses

the following are the 95 theses from

The Cluetrain Manifesto:
The End of Business as Usual

Copyright © 1999, 2001 Levine, Locke, Searls & Weinberger.
All rights reserved.

cluetrain.com

back to table of contents 

NEXT: Elevator Rap



A powerful global conversation has begun. Through the Internet, people are discovering and inventing new ways to share relevant knowledge with blinding speed. As a direct result, markets are getting smarter—and getting smarter faster than most companies.

These markets are conversations. Their members communicate in language that is natural, open, honest, direct, funny and often shocking. Whether explaining or complaining, joking or serious, the human voice is unmistakably genuine. It can't be faked.

roadkill

Most corporations, on the other hand, only know how to talk in the soothing, humorless monotone of the mission statement, marketing brochure, and your-call-is-important-to-us busy signal. Same old tone, same old lies. No wonder networked markets have no respect for companies unable or unwilling to speak as they do.

But learning to speak in a human voice is not some trick, nor will corporations convince us they are human with lip service about "listening to customers." They will only sound human when they empower real human beings to speak on their behalf.

While many such people already work for companies today, most companies ignore their ability to deliver genuine knowledge, opting instead to crank out sterile happytalk that insults the intelligence of markets literally too smart to buy it.

However, employees are getting hyperlinked even as markets are. Companies need to listen carefully to both. Mostly, they need to get out of the way so intranetworked employees can converse directly with internetworked markets.

Corporate firewalls have kept smart employees in and smart markets out. It's going to cause real pain to tear those walls down. But the result will be a new kind of conversation. And it will be the most exciting conversation business has ever engaged in.


if you only have time for one clue this year, this is the one to get...

Online Markets...

Networked markets are beginning to self-organize faster than the companies that have traditionally served them. Thanks to the web, markets are becoming better informed, smarter, and more demanding of qualities missing from most business organizations.

...People of Earth

The sky is open to the stars. Clouds roll over us night and day. Oceans rise and fall. Whatever you may have heard, this is our world, our place to be. Whatever you've been told, our flags fly free. Our heart goes on forever. People of Earth, remember.

95 Theses

  1. Markets are conversations.
  2. Markets consist of human beings, not demographic sectors.
  3. Conversations among human beings sound human. They are conducted in a human voice.
  4. Whether delivering information, opinions, perspectives, dissenting arguments or humorous asides, the human voice is typically open, natural, uncontrived.
  5. People recognize each other as such from the sound of this voice.
  6. The Internet is enabling conversations among human beings that were simply not possible in the era of mass media.
  7. Hyperlinks subvert hierarchy.
  8. In both internetworked markets and among intranetworked employees, people are speaking to each other in a powerful new way.
  9. These networked conversations are enabling powerful new forms of social organization and knowledge exchange to emerge.
  10. As a result, markets are getting smarter, more informed, more organized. Participation in a networked market changes people fundamentally.
  11. People in networked markets have figured out that they get far better information and support from one another than from vendors. So much for corporate rhetoric about adding value to commoditized products.
  12. There are no secrets. The networked market knows more than companies do about their own products. And whether the news is good or bad, they tell everyone.
  13. What's happening to markets is also happening among employees. A metaphysical construct called "The Company" is the only thing standing between the two.
  14. Corporations do not speak in the same voice as these new networked conversations. To their intended online audiences, companies sound hollow, flat, literally inhuman.
  15. In just a few more years, the current homogenized "voice" of business—the sound of mission statements and brochures—will seem as contrived and artificial as the language of the 18th century French court.
  16. Already, companies that speak in the language of the pitch, the dog-and-pony show, are no longer speaking to anyone.
  17. Companies that assume online markets are the same markets that used to watch their ads on television are kidding themselves.
  18. Companies that don't realize their markets are now networked person-to-person, getting smarter as a result and deeply joined in conversation are missing their best opportunity.
  19. Companies can now communicate with their markets directly. If they blow it, it could be their last chance.
  20. Companies need to realize their markets are often laughing. At them.
  21. Companies need to lighten up and take themselves less seriously. They need to get a sense of humor.
  22. Getting a sense of humor does not mean putting some jokes on the corporate web site. Rather, it requires big values, a little humility, straight talk, and a genuine point of view.
  23. Companies attempting to "position" themselves need to take a position. Optimally, it should relate to something their market actually cares about.
  24. Bombastic boasts—"We are positioned to become the preeminent provider of XYZ"—do not constitute a position.
  25. Companies need to come down from their Ivory Towers and talk to the people with whom they hope to create relationships.
  26. Public Relations does not relate to the public. Companies are deeply afraid of their markets.
  27. By speaking in language that is distant, uninviting, arrogant, they build walls to keep markets at bay.
  28. Most marketing programs are based on the fear that the market might see what's really going on inside the company.
  29. Elvis said it best: "We can't go on together with suspicious minds."
  30. Brand loyalty is the corporate version of going steady, but the breakup is inevitable—and coming fast. Because they are networked, smart markets are able to renegotiate relationships with blinding speed.
  31. Networked markets can change suppliers overnight. Networked knowledge workers can change employers over lunch. Your own "downsizing initiatives" taught us to ask the question: "Loyalty? What's that?"
  32. Smart markets will find suppliers who speak their own language.
  33. Learning to speak with a human voice is not a parlor trick. It can't be "picked up" at some tony conference.
  34. To speak with a human voice, companies must share the concerns of their communities.
  35. But first, they must belong to a community.
  36. Companies must ask themselves where their corporate cultures end.
  37. If their cultures end before the community begins, they will have no market.
  38. Human communities are based on discourse—on human speech about human concerns.
  39. The community of discourse is the market.
  40. Companies that do not belong to a community of discourse will die.
  41. Companies make a religion of security, but this is largely a red herring. Most are protecting less against competitors than against their own market and workforce.
  42. As with networked markets, people are also talking to each other directly inside the company—and not just about rules and regulations, boardroom directives, bottom lines.
  43. Such conversations are taking place today on corporate intranets. But only when the conditions are right.
  44. Companies typically install intranets top-down to distribute HR policies and other corporate information that workers are doing their best to ignore.
  45. Intranets naturally tend to route around boredom. The best are built bottom-up by engaged individuals cooperating to construct something far more valuable: an intranetworked corporate conversation.
  46. A healthy intranet organizes workers in many meanings of the word. Its effect is more radical than the agenda of any union.
  47. While this scares companies witless, they also depend heavily on open intranets to generate and share critical knowledge. They need to resist the urge to "improve" or control these networked conversations.
  48. When corporate intranets are not constrained by fear and legalistic rules, the type of conversation they encourage sounds remarkably like the conversation of the networked marketplace.
  49. Org charts worked in an older economy where plans could be fully understood from atop steep management pyramids and detailed work orders could be handed down from on high.
  50. Today, the org chart is hyperlinked, not hierarchical. Respect for hands-on knowledge wins over respect for abstract authority.
  51. Command-and-control management styles both derive from and reinforce bureaucracy, power tripping and an overall culture of paranoia.
  52. Paranoia kills conversation. That's its point. But lack of open conversation kills companies.
  53. There are two conversations going on. One inside the company. One with the market.
  54. In most cases, neither conversation is going very well. Almost invariably, the cause of failure can be traced to obsolete notions of command and control.
  55. As policy, these notions are poisonous. As tools, they are broken. Command and control are met with hostility by intranetworked knowledge workers and generate distrust in internetworked markets.
  56. These two conversations want to talk to each other. They are speaking the same language. They recognize each other's voices.
  57. Smart companies will get out of the way and help the inevitable to happen sooner.
  58. If willingness to get out of the way is taken as a measure of IQ, then very few companies have yet wised up.
  59. However subliminally at the moment, millions of people now online perceive companies as little more than quaint legal fictions that are actively preventing these conversations from intersecting.
  60. This is suicidal. Markets want to talk to companies.
  61. Sadly, the part of the company a networked market wants to talk to is usually hidden behind a smokescreen of hucksterism, of language that rings false—and often is.
  62. Markets do not want to talk to flacks and hucksters. They want to participate in the conversations going on behind the corporate firewall.
  63. De-cloaking, getting personal: We are those markets. We want to talk to you.
  64. We want access to your corporate information, to your plans and strategies, your best thinking, your genuine knowledge. We will not settle for the 4-color brochure, for web sites chock-a-block with eye candy but lacking any substance.
  65. We're also the workers who make your companies go. We want to talk to customers directly in our own voices, not in platitudes written into a script.
  66. As markets, as workers, both of us are sick to death of getting our information by remote control. Why do we need faceless annual reports and third-hand market research studies to introduce us to each other?
  67. As markets, as workers, we wonder why you're not listening. You seem to be speaking a different language.
  68. The inflated self-important jargon you sling around—in the press, at your conferences—what's that got to do with us?
  69. Maybe you're impressing your investors. Maybe you're impressing Wall Street. You're not impressing us.
  70. If you don't impress us, your investors are going to take a bath. Don't they understand this? If they did, they wouldn't let you talk that way.
  71. Your tired notions of "the market" make our eyes glaze over. We don't recognize ourselves in your projections—perhaps because we know we're already elsewhere.
  72. We like this new marketplace much better. In fact, we are creating it.
  73. You're invited, but it's our world. Take your shoes off at the door. If you want to barter with us, get down off that camel!
  74. We are immune to advertising. Just forget it.
  75. If you want us to talk to you, tell us something. Make it something interesting for a change.
  76. We've got some ideas for you too: some new tools we need, some better service. Stuff we'd be willing to pay for. Got a minute?
  77. You're too busy "doing business" to answer our email? Oh gosh, sorry, gee, we'll come back later. Maybe.
  78. You want us to pay? We want you to pay attention.
  79. We want you to drop your trip, come out of your neurotic self-involvement, join the party.
  80. Don't worry, you can still make money. That is, as long as it's not the only thing on your mind.
  81. Have you noticed that, in itself, money is kind of one-dimensional and boring? What else can we talk about?
  82. Your product broke. Why? We'd like to ask the guy who made it. Your corporate strategy makes no sense. We'd like to have a chat with your CEO. What do you mean she's not in?
  83. We want you to take 50 million of us as seriously as you take one reporter from The Wall Street Journal.
  84. We know some people from your company. They're pretty cool online. Do you have any more like that you're hiding? Can they come out and play?
  85. When we have questions we turn to each other for answers. If you didn't have such a tight rein on "your people" maybe they'd be among the people we'd turn to.
  86. When we're not busy being your "target market," many of us are your people. We'd rather be talking to friends online than watching the clock. That would get your name around better than your entire million dollar web site. But you tell us speaking to the market is Marketing's job.
  87. We'd like it if you got what's going on here. That'd be real nice. But it would be a big mistake to think we're holding our breath.
  88. We have better things to do than worry about whether you'll change in time to get our business. Business is only a part of our lives. It seems to be all of yours. Think about it: who needs whom?
  89. We have real power and we know it. If you don't quite see the light, some other outfit will come along that's more attentive, more interesting, more fun to play with.
  90. Even at its worst, our newfound conversation is more interesting than most trade shows, more entertaining than any TV sitcom, and certainly more true-to-life than the corporate web sites we've been seeing.
  91. Our allegiance is to ourselves—our friends, our new allies and acquaintances, even our sparring partners. Companies that have no part in this world, also have no future.
  92. Companies are spending billions of dollars on Y2K. Why can't they hear this market timebomb ticking? The stakes are even higher.
  93. We're both inside companies and outside them. The boundaries that separate our conversations look like the Berlin Wall today, but they're really just an annoyance. We know they're coming down. We're going to work from both sides to take them down.
  94. To traditional corporations, networked conversations may appear confused, may sound confusing. But we are organizing faster than they are. We have better tools, more new ideas, no rules to slow us down.
  95. We are waking up and linking to each other. We are watching. But we are not waiting.




The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual
Copyright © 1999, 2001 Levine, Locke, Searls & Weinberger.
All rights reserved.

NEXT: Elevator Rap
back to Table of Contents


Web annotations

 

michelleferrier says...

What are the themes that emerge from the 95 Theses? What shifts in business and marketing are predicted by The Cluetrain Manifesto(TCM)?


michelleferrier says...

Remember this book is 10 years old. Which of the 95 theses still holds true and which seem like smokeblowing?


michelleferrier says...

Any Trekkies in the group that can explain this concept?


searley says...

A lot of this seems to conflict with predictions in our COM530 readings that said in the not-too-distant future people will count virtual beings as among their best social network friends and favorite celebrities without knowing -- or caring, or even thinking about -- whether they are human or virtual.


searley says...

There will always be a place for, and value in, mission statements. They help focus resources and unify teams. They may be developed, styled and presented in new ways to the point they bear little resemblance to their 20th century counterparts, but they'll still be mission statements at their core.


searley says...

The government may have been faster than the corporate world to embrace Web 2.0 tools: http://bit.ly/I6xLu


searley says...

In the limited research I've done for my COM530 project ("The Future of the Interactive Newsroom"), this is a point that keeps reemerging: Journalists whose employers brought them in on the reorganization process were generally accepting of changes, not matter how drastic, and even discovered that many of their gut-level fears were unfounded. Those shut out of the process, however, were more likely to resist changing, perhaps killing on arrival even the best orchestrated reorganization plan.


searley says...

We all like to think we're immune to advertising, but I don't think any of us actually are. And interactive media enables advertising that's even more embedded in our day-to-day lives and harder to shut out. If you think about it, those who abhor advertising and make a point of saying so are more affected by it than those who are indifferent.


searley says...

Best Buy is trying to break from the mold in this respect, and is having some success, with Twelpforce: http://tcrn.ch/864


dparsons22 says...

This reminds me a lot of when I call Time Warner Cable. Although they have tried to make some advances by letting you scream your requests at a computer voice instead of following a menu-by-numbers approach, it doesn't really make it much better. How often are any of us really satisfied until we speak to a real person?


dparsons22 says...

I am going to go ahead and call this bluff: we're not immune to advertising. Maybe more resilient than we once were, but as we change, so does advertising. A better phrase may be "We are immune to older advertising schemes."


wcampbell5 says...

Then how is Wal-Mart doing so well. It is one of the least personable stores we've all been to.


asianjon110 says...

A good example of companies trying to dodge this is in gaming industry. Game publishers sometimes will not send copies of games to review sites such as IGN or Gamespot for fear of bad reviews which lead to low sales.


asianjon110 says...

Um, disagree. In today's society while we may zone out of advertising, we are not immune to it. Think about kids. They see Miley Cyrus is now selling clothes through Max Azria on TV and they tell parents they want it. Or when a catchy song is in the background of a commercial, more often than not, a viewer will associate that song with that commercial.


asianjon110 replies...

I'm not a trekkie... but HP fans will know:
cloaking = invisible
de-cloaking = becoming visible


michelleferrier replies...

Price is a strong motivator, despite poor customer service and bad conversations about your business model. While I refuse to shop WM on principle, I can't stop my husband from going because of the purchasing power he has. I don't think there's an absolute here...WalMart controls the price conversation. Period.


erikfurlan says...

This was exactly how the intranet at my last job (PNC Bank) was done -- it was a top-down distribution network for corporate "back-patting" and information dumping to the "worker bees."


erikfurlan says...

This whole section here about "communities" mirrors some of the points from COM530. Companies needing to address the concerns being discussed in these communities from within the communities, not with a press release or corporate brochure.


erikfurlan replies...

I agree with your disagree. As much as we want to say we are immune, deep down, we aren't. We still know the Aflac duck, the Burger King, the E-trade baby


erikfurlan says...

(i.e. -- wikipedia or any of the sites where you can post a question or problem for discussion/answers)


erikfurlan says...

I think this whole list came off as definitely populist, and it even struck me as a bit antagonistic -- picking a fight that isn't really there. Maybe it is because it is from 10 years ago.


brookcorwin says...

brookcorwin replies...

The craft of advertising is much more subtle than say 40 years ago, when everything was canned pitches touting products with superlatives. Now it's more about associations, and licensing a popular piece of media is key. But it's just as effective or companies wouldn't be paying millions for what still amounts to traditional campaigns


brookcorwin says...

In theory this seems true. The information age should speed up the rise and fall of brands. But in the past 10 years (other than financial sector collapses or Enron-like scandals) it seems the same brands still stay on top in all industries. Feel free to contradict me if you can think of examples of major brands falling fast


brookcorwin replies...

also, much of Wal-Mart's audience (rural, less educated) is on the low end of the digital divide. They aren't yet plugged into all the networking and information sharing that this manifesto keeps saying will reward open, personable companies


cathyfreeman says...

This is a "new" topic focus at almost every large meeting and seminar I attend centered on non-profit marketing and marketing in general. It is saturating the information circuit. Interesting that this was written ten years ago...


jabbey says...

I disagree. I think that newspapers and magazines that allow for Letters to the Editor, and radio segments where numerous callers phone in enabled conversation just as well. The difference is that more people are able to converse with each other.


jabbey replies...

Whatever happened to 'any publicity is good publicity'?


jabbey says...

I completely agree. The companies need to be on the same level of the people they want to reach in order to know how to best appease them.


jabbey replies...

Contextual advertising! Like, seeing that the people in a web community you want to target like fanfiction, so you market your product using fanfiction.


jabbey replies...

Yep! There are banners all over pages, but we don't complain until a pop-up window disrupts what we're doing or a commercial comes on the t.v.


jabbey replies...

I agree with y'all. As much as we complain about commercials, that's the only reason some people tune in to the Superbowl, and then talk about them at the watercooler the next day. Youtube backs this up as well, with links for entertaining commercials being shared from person to person.


"arushton" says...

Exactly why word of mouth is so valuable in terms of marketing


"arushton" says...

This rings true to my research topic for COM 530. Government seems to fall flat on it's face because the public often feel they do not know what is going on, how money is being spent, who is making key policy decisions etc. It is interesting "transparency" is such a relevant carry-over to the business world


"arushton" says...

Well said, I agree with that completely.


atraboulsi says...

here goes the 'Spiral of Silence'


atraboulsi replies...

this is a prime example of the 'Knowledge Gap Theory' in our Com530 class


atraboulsi replies...

This doesn't necessarily mean that we are victims of advertising however, this just means we can point out various techniques and characters used by advertisers and ad campaigns. i think as a whole, we are not being influenced to buy, based on our age and education in comparison to the Tweens that eat up anything with Miley Cyrus printed on it.


mderoberts says...

This is true to an extent, and is ambitious for a statement from 10 years ago. There is a lot more exposure gained from the net, but the fundamentals of marketing are the same regardless of your medium. Televisions haven't disappeared...yet.


mderoberts says...

In no way is this smug or assuming too much, but I suppose 95 theses sound better than 94.


mderoberts replies...

and are approaching monopolies. With banks, cell phone service, whatever...companies are buying up other companies and brand loyalty may not be loyalty as much as optionless.


mderoberts says...

I had a temp job working at a call center doing computer support for Pfizer sales reps and there were scripts you had to follow from answering the phone, to finding a script that matched their problem, and even before you said good bye. If you deviated from the script you were chastised.


mderoberts says...

Writing to some companies is like writing to Santa Claus. Usually you don't hear back, but when you do it's not really from him.


mderoberts replies...

I agree with Eric. There was not shortage of anger here either. Maybe some of this was written this way as an attempt at humor, but also to address/create an issue, pioneering a call to action.


melee4 says...

The public forms stronger relationships with companies that they feel they can have a two-way conversation with (or at least put a name to a face).


melee4 replies...

Did you know that the average American sees over 3,000 advertising messages a day. Just a fun/crazy fact.


melee4 replies...

I completely agree. When righting a journalism article my junior year of undergrad, I wrote to a huge corporation hoping someone might right back (even if it wasn't the person I wanted maybe I would have the information I needed). Wrong. I got a nice little note with one paragraph that thanked me for my interest. The persons name wasn't even signed...I got the stamp signature.


kford8 says...

This section about companies must share the concerns of their communities and must belong to a community...really made me think about the small businesses. In my hometown, they were the backbone of the community and always there supporting the community. It makes a big impact when a company follows that motto.


kford8 says...

The last company I worked for use an intranet site. It was the only way we could perform our daily tasks, learn about updates in the company and useful training information.


kford8 says...

Consumer to consumer comes to mind when reading this comment. Now businesses are not only competing with each other but they’re competing with ebay and craigslist.


cc340 says...

This is especially true in the evolution of film marketing. If you check out old posters, they all use hyperbole. For example, check out this trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUPh7XWoq7Q for "The Wild One." It's hilarious.


cc340 says...

The people in front of the "firewall" aren't always necessarily flacks though...the markets don't need to know everything that's going on within a company.


cc340 says...

I like this thought. Companies should consider themselves and their markets as one community, instead of two separate groups.


lindamisiura replies...

Its also a matter of immediacy. With the phone-ins on radio, the interaction did exist in real time, but the delay in response with newspapers removed the back-and-forth nature of conversation. Blogs and chat have allowed us to reply more quickly, in a sense changing the nature of the conversation, though admittedly not creating conversation that could not have existed prior to the internet.


lindamisiura replies...

Excellent point! It is essential to consider the target audience with advertising nowadays... while children and teens may still be heavily influenced by advertising (and perhaps even more so the peer pressure they encounter at school), people in their 20s and older are usually educated enough to see an advertisement and not be immediately struck with the sensation of "I've got to have that!"


lindamisiura says...

There are 6 theses here that focus on intranets. The only experience I had with an intranet was at a non-profit in DC, where it was mostly used as a hub for information. Are companies using intranets to their full potential? And are they really as essential as the authors claim they can be?


"corymorrison" says...

This really aggravates me. If companies cannot communicate what it is they can do for their customers/clients in common language, how do they expect to connect with people? Advertisers learn to show, not tell people things, but companies need to figure out basic ways to communicate on a real level.


"corymorrison" says...

Statistics of demo/psychographics only get you so far. They may not explain why on any given day customer __ acts in ___ way when traditionally they have not done so.


"corymorrison" says...

people love the opportunity to critique anything, whether it is positive or negative. Companies should consider that just as helpful as the work its employees do.


"corymorrison" says...

I may be misinterpreting this, but I dont think brand loyalty is something easily broken. After all, the word is loyalty. It's especially hard to break when people dont even realize they're loyal to a brand.


"corymorrison" says...

True, I can think of a few instances where social media destroys a company- YouTube video of the Dominos pizza guy tainting the food- "United Breaks Guitars" songs by the guy whose guitar was broken and not reimbursed for by United Airlines.


brostami replies...

Very true. Who really invests in anything anymore without reading reviews first?


brostami replies...

I definitely think age plays a factor in the level of influence advertising can have, but I don't completely agree that older people are less susceptible to its effects. In recent years, I have become an Apple junkie and every time they come out with new stuff, I get that "I've got to have it" sensation. They have great advertising, but it probably has to do with other factors too, like brand loyalty and the company philosophy. I feel like they've always been ahead of the curve and one of the smarter companies when it comes to business practices and customer relations.


brostami says...

The problem is that it's usually always about the money. Many companies are unaware of the conversation, because the only language they speak in is numbers. The value of a consumer is essentially tied to a dollar amount. Customer service departments attempt to make consumers feel important or even empowered, but in the end it all comes down to the numbers.


brostami says...

A lot of large corporations started out as small, family owned businesses (think Walmart) that catered to the individual. At what point does the corporate machine take over and devalue the identity of the consumer?


bstuggle replies...

I think it still holds true that companies speaking in the language a consumer can't understand is speaking a language that falls on deaf ears whether it's on the Internet or in a true form of advertising...what this says is still true: companies that use this certain "language of the pitch" aren't really setting themselves apart.


bstuggle replies...

This is the direction advertisers are now being forced to take online...finding that real niche and using the stuff that will interest those consumers to really push your product.


bstuggle says...

We are constantly watching, but not waiting, this is true! If Tim Berners-Lee and other great minds that brought us the Internet had just waited for someone else to advance society, we wouldn't be where we are today.


akreitman replies...

Unfortunately, these days it has gotten worse because companies cozy up to potential clients, but then as soon as they sign the contract on the dotted line, they ignore the client until the contract needs to be renewed. They are trained to make as many sales calls as possible and unfortuntately that cuts down on any chance of a nice relationship. I''m speaking for some not all situations of course.


melspence says...

I'm questioning this statement since a manifesto is very much like a mission statement. They're using the same language and set up as businesses to get rid of businesses.


kburrows says...

does that go for college brochures too?